Azure Fang
Oh no, he's here?
@Napsack
Thank you to the team for taking this all under consideration. That given, I’ll weigh in on the rest of the DNP types. Please, take or ignore this as is fitting. Remember, all here is simply one person’s opinion.
Upload Credit Change: I’ve never agreed with this though I’ve kept quiet as it’s more a point of vanity than anything and thus not worth arguing over. It’s vain for an artist to think they should preempt the actual uploader of an image when their name is already in the tags and possibly in any watermark/signature that they should damn well be applying to their art. Should not exist.
Artist Upload/With Permission Only: There is no good, round option here. Stop allowing artists to use this as a blanket DNP. Give artists a proper Do Not Post; if they don’t want to post here, give them that actual capability rather than letting them hide behind the lie they do now. If not, your current answer is to just take after an arbitrary expiry; I understand you want to protect this site’s userbase, but you granted that control to the artist and should honor it. If you want to prevent abuse, add a No Post level of DNP. If you have an artist verifibly posting elsewhere when they have an Artist Only here, reach out to said artist to update their DNP; if they don’t, convert them to a full No Post and grandfather all (if any) existing content. Once converted, list the conversion date in the DNP so that any content after that date may be verified as a violation, but if an artist comes back and wants back in or wants to rescind the DNP all together, let them.
Limited Edits: Fair. No source contention since permission is already given, however following below may be considered.
Separate Edits: Also fair, as long as the separate artist tag still includes the name of the original artist. The “<artist name> Edit” tag convention is perfect, though sourcing could be contentious. Description should require source of original, while source field may then be used for the editor.
Content Delay: Reasonable with caveat. PWYW (pay what you want) content with a minimum of $0 should be considered under the “free” clause, while PWYW with a minimum price should be considered paid content, and they should be delineated as such.
Artist Tag Change: I can respect artist anonymity. I can’t respect “random”. These should be lumped under “artist: Anonymous Artist”, period.
Hidden By Default: Respect with caveat. Rather than requiring login, this should just be part of the default filters. This allows non-logged users to grab a public custom to bypass. When any user utilizes a custom filter that does not include whatever HBD tag is present, a warning should appear alerting said user that they forfeit the right to complain about unfiltered content as they have made a conscious effort to remove said filters; onus on the user.
NOTABLE EDIT:
It’s worth mentioning that there are extant DNPs with “comment lock” descriptions. If comment lock is being abolished, assess these. Contact the affected artists; if they want their content removed going forward, so be it. But don’t leave the existing locks in place as this feels like what may have initiated this entire episode.
Thank you to the team for taking this all under consideration. That given, I’ll weigh in on the rest of the DNP types. Please, take or ignore this as is fitting. Remember, all here is simply one person’s opinion.
Upload Credit Change: I’ve never agreed with this though I’ve kept quiet as it’s more a point of vanity than anything and thus not worth arguing over. It’s vain for an artist to think they should preempt the actual uploader of an image when their name is already in the tags and possibly in any watermark/signature that they should damn well be applying to their art. Should not exist.
Artist Upload/With Permission Only: There is no good, round option here. Stop allowing artists to use this as a blanket DNP. Give artists a proper Do Not Post; if they don’t want to post here, give them that actual capability rather than letting them hide behind the lie they do now. If not, your current answer is to just take after an arbitrary expiry; I understand you want to protect this site’s userbase, but you granted that control to the artist and should honor it. If you want to prevent abuse, add a No Post level of DNP. If you have an artist verifibly posting elsewhere when they have an Artist Only here, reach out to said artist to update their DNP; if they don’t, convert them to a full No Post and grandfather all (if any) existing content. Once converted, list the conversion date in the DNP so that any content after that date may be verified as a violation, but if an artist comes back and wants back in or wants to rescind the DNP all together, let them.
Limited Edits: Fair. No source contention since permission is already given, however following below may be considered.
Separate Edits: Also fair, as long as the separate artist tag still includes the name of the original artist. The “<artist name> Edit” tag convention is perfect, though sourcing could be contentious. Description should require source of original, while source field may then be used for the editor.
Content Delay: Reasonable with caveat. PWYW (pay what you want) content with a minimum of $0 should be considered under the “free” clause, while PWYW with a minimum price should be considered paid content, and they should be delineated as such.
Artist Tag Change: I can respect artist anonymity. I can’t respect “random”. These should be lumped under “artist: Anonymous Artist”, period.
Hidden By Default: Respect with caveat. Rather than requiring login, this should just be part of the default filters. This allows non-logged users to grab a public custom to bypass. When any user utilizes a custom filter that does not include whatever HBD tag is present, a warning should appear alerting said user that they forfeit the right to complain about unfiltered content as they have made a conscious effort to remove said filters; onus on the user.
NOTABLE EDIT:
It’s worth mentioning that there are extant DNPs with “comment lock” descriptions. If comment lock is being abolished, assess these. Contact the affected artists; if they want their content removed going forward, so be it. But don’t leave the existing locks in place as this feels like what may have initiated this entire episode.