Dupe and Broken Image Reports for Anons

Wasn’t sure where to post this. Didn’t seem like there was a dedicated thread so I figured I’d create one. To start us off:
 
https://ponybooru.org/2091628
 
Been processing for two months.

Rather than collating these in a thread, you might be better off reporting them for ‘other’ and explaining that the image has failed to process. Those reports go directly to the mods/admins and are usually cleaned up pretty swiftly.
 
That said, if people feel like posting these here I’m not going to stop them. It still helps.

@Napsack  
I’m going to be honest with you: I completely forgot that reporting was even a thing.

Greetings, I was pointed here to flag duplicate images I noticed as current site design doesn’t allow for background ponies to report dupes.
 
Old Post:  

 
New Post  
>>2742988p (merged)
 
Recommend merging the new post into the old post, I can’t see any differences between the two.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Thank you for the report, those two are now merged.

A few more:
 
Old:  

 
New:  
>>2742992t (merged)
 
 
Old:  

 
New:  
>>2742991t (merged)
 
I can’t see any difference, same frames from the show, same file format, image size, and file size.
 

 
@Napsack  
Thanks for doing this.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Does seem to be the case. Merged.
 
And thank you for reporting these. It’s very nice of you to put the work in.

New Upload:  
>>2748828t (merged)
 
Old Upload:  

 
They looks the same to me, same file type, size, dimension, and animation length.
 
I can’t say if the guy listed as the artist on the reupload is the original poster or not, they might have just reposted it to their Deviant Art account.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Done.

New Upload:
 
>>2748064t (merged)
 
Old Upload:
 

 
Everything appears to be identical between the two.
 
 
@Napsack  
Thanks again for taking care of these.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Done as well.
 
And thank you once again for posting them. Animated dupes can be quite hard to spot, so you’re being quite helpful.

Old Upload:  

This image is blocked by your current filter - click here to display it anyway

your current filter.

 
New Upload:  

This image is blocked by your current filter - click here to display it anyway

your current filter.

 
According to the artist the new one is meant as an update, so I guess the colder color temperature in the original was an error.

@Anonymous #78F4  
We’ll keep both since there is a difference between them.

Old Upload:  

 
New Upload  
>>2751281t (merged)
 
The new upload is 720p, the old one is 1080p.
 
Old Upload:  
>>1801777t (merged)
 
New Upload:  
>>2751282t (merged)
 
This one’s trickier. The old upload is larger, but the color information is messed up and over-saturated. I really don’t think both need to be kept, but I don’t know which way would be best to merge.
 
@Acres  
That’s fair. I only brought it up since the artist had them merged over on Derpi and you have to good eye and a decent display to see the difference easily.

@Anonymous #78F4  
First one merged backwards, second merged forwards. The older version of that screencap might have been higher res, but the quality was very low.
 
Edit: Forget that second bit, just uploaded a full 1080p version of the screencap and merged both of them into that.  

Old Upload:  
>>2734476t (merged)
 
New Upload:  

 
Same dimensions, the newer image is PNG.

@Anonymous #78F4  
I’ll look into it. thanks.
 
Fixed. Thank you for the report.

Old Upload:  
>>2624583t (merged)
 
New Upload:  

 
New upload is a lot bigger.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Merged, thank you!

Old Upload:  

 
New Upload:  
>>2754872t (merged)
 
They appear to be identical.
 
Old Upload:  

 
New Upload:  
>>2754849t (merged)
 
Same story here.

@Anonymous #78F4  
I’ll look into it

Old Upload:  

 
New Upload:  
>>2759876t (merged)
 
Old Upload’s a full 1080p and the new one is, well, smaller than that.

@Anonymous #78F4  
Merged backwards

Old Upload:  

 
New Upload:  

 
One’s MP4, the other’s WEBM.

@Anonymous #78F4  
They’re different filetypes, so we’ll be keeping them. We’ll most likely be treating them like gif vs webm images.